Note: this is going on in Virginia. Not up in D.C.
Nevertheless — heads up people!
Get ready for a full on attack on a woman’s right to choose in the months to come.
5 Antiabortion Bills Advance in House
By Steven Ginsberg for the Washington Post.

Virginia’s House of Delegates approved a bill today that would allow health care workers to invoke a “conscience clause” if they wish to avoid participating in abortion or birth control procedures.
The measure was among five abortion limits that cleared various stages in the General Assembly, and activists on both sides of the issue said they were predicting a landmark year for abortion regulation in Virginia…
…The Senate narrowly upheld Warner’s late-term veto last year, but abortion opponents said they believe they have the votes to override one this year.
Despite the possibility of several new restrictions, abortion rights activists were pleased with the defeat of the clinic regulation bill, because they said its tough regulations would have forced most abortion clinics to close.
“It was the most important vote in the General Assembly so far on whether abortion rights would still be available to the women of Virginia,” said Bennet Greenberg, director of government relations at Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia, an abortion rights group.
Sen. Ken Cuccinelli (R-Fairfax), sponsor of the bill, said he would try to “come up with an alternate scheme that would improve the health and safety in those clinics. It can be done, and it can be done in this session.”…
“There’s been nothing like this, this wave of anti-choice legislation,” Sen. Janet D. Howell (D-Fairfax) said…

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8403-2003Jan31.html
5 Antiabortion Bills Advance in House
Va. Delegates Also Pass Vietnam Flag Bill
“There’s been nothing like this, this wave of anti-choice legislation,” Sen. Janet D. Howell (D-Fairfax) said. (File Photo)
By Steven Ginsberg
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 1, 2003; Page B01
RICHMOND, Jan. 31 — Virginia’s House of Delegates approved a bill today that would allow health care workers to invoke a “conscience clause” if they wish to avoid participating in abortion or birth control procedures.
The measure was among five abortion limits that cleared various stages in the General Assembly, and activists on both sides of the issue said they were predicting a landmark year for abortion regulation in Virginia.
Bills that would bar a practice defined as “partial-birth infanticide,” a late-term procedure commonly called “partial-birth abortion” by opponents; require parental consent for abortions; and remove a woman’s mental health as a condition for allowing a late-term abortion all advanced toward final votes on the House floor.
The Senate’s Education and Health Committee approved a parental consent bill for the first time. The one setback today for abortion opponents came when the committee failed to pass a bill that would have toughened the regulation of abortion clinics.
“We are very optimistic,” said Victoria Cobb, director of legislative affairs for the Family Foundation, who said today was a “historic day in Virginia. We believe the voice of Virginians has been heard.”
Sen. Janet D. Howell (D-Fairfax), who voted against Thursday’s late-term abortion bill and today’s parental consent and clinic regulation bills, said “there’s been nothing like this, this wave of anti-choice legislation.” To become law, the bills must win approval in both chambers of the assembly and receive the signature of Gov. Mark R. Warner (D).
Meanwhile today, the House and Senate advanced many other bills as they approached the halfway point in their 46-day session. The House of Delegates passed a measure that would pay tribute to the flag of the defeated Republic of Vietnam.
Delegates also approved a bill that would require doctors to inform parents when minors seek treatment for such conditions as sexually transmitted diseases and depression.
The House Privileges and Elections Committee approved a measure that would permit Virginia’s governor to run for successive terms, setting up a vote on the floor. Virginia is the only state that does not allow its governor to run for consecutive terms. If approved, the legislation would apply to governors elected after Warner.
The action on abortion issues in Virginia leads a nationwide push by abortion opponents to place new restrictions on the procedure, said Leah Oliver, a policy analyst for the National Conference of State Legislatures. There are nearly 200 bills in 38 states seeking to restrict abortions, but none has as many as Virginia or has acted as quickly, Oliver said.
Abortion opponents in Maryland say they hope to advance some restrictions under Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R). Ehrlich has said he would consider bills on the late-term procedure and parental consent, but he faces strong opposition in the General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats.
Many of Virginia’s abortion bills have been proposed before, and anti-abortion activists attributed their success this year to strong efforts by interest groups and lawmakers.
Those working to limit abortions also have been aided by last year’s election of several antiabortion legislators and more supportive representation on the Health and Education Committee.
Lobbyists said legislators are mindful of those election successes as they look forward to this November, when all 140 assembly seats will be on the ballot. “They are more sensitive in an election year,” Cobb said.
Supporters of the conscience clause said it would allow physicians, pharmacists and other health care professionals to opt out of providing birth control pills, morning-after pills or other medicine that they see as a form of murder.
The bill’s opponents worried about what a rural resident would do if her pharmacist wouldn’t fill a prescription for medication, particularly morning-after pills that could let her avoid a surgical abortion.
In brief but passionate debate on the floor of the House, supporters of a parental consent bill said it was one of “the most significant to ever come before the assembly,” while others said a ban on the late-term procedure would help to stop the “killing” that occurs in Virginia.
Supporters of parental consent said it would ensure that parents have a greater say in the health and safety of their daughters. The Senate version includes a provision that allows minors to obtain consent from a judge if their parents refuse to allow an abortion.
Opponents said a consent law would lead to back-alley abortions for those afraid to tell their parents that they were pregnant.
Warner vetoed a late-term ban last year, and he has signaled his intent to do so again unless it allows exceptions for the health of a mother, which the assembly versions do not. He also said Thursday that he opposed the consent bill.
The Senate narrowly upheld Warner’s late-term veto last year, but abortion opponents said they believe they have the votes to override one this year.
Despite the possibility of several new restrictions, abortion rights activists were pleased with the defeat of the clinic regulation bill, because they said its tough regulations would have forced most abortion clinics to close.
“It was the most important vote in the General Assembly so far on whether abortion rights would still be available to the women of Virginia,” said Bennet Greenberg, director of government relations at Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia, an abortion rights group.
Sen. Ken Cuccinelli (R-Fairfax), sponsor of the bill, said he would try to “come up with an alternate scheme that would improve the health and safety in those clinics. It can be done, and it can be done in this session.”