For many US vets, war is not the answer

Adding to veterans’ anger and fuelling a growing sense of betrayal, last week the House of Representatives voted to approve a $25 billion cut in veterans’ benefits – including disability benefits – over the next 10 years at the same time as Mr Bush seeks massive tax cuts for a wealthy few.
“The President’s words about supporting the troops are quite empty, on two counts,” Erik Gustafson, who fought in the 1991 Gulf War, said of Mr Bush’s speech on Friday.
“One, there has been a series of miscalculations that put a lot of people in harm’s way unnecessarily, and secondly supporting our troops doesn’t mean turning our backs on our veterans, especially when we’ll be having a whole new generation of Gulf War veterans,” he said.
Mr Gustafson is executive director of the Education for Peace in Iraq Centre, which he set up in 1998 with an emphasis on improving living conditions for ordinary Iraqis.
Mr Pollack said the cuts to veterans’ benefits are “an indication of the lengths to which this administration is willing to go to fund their priorities, which are obviously aggressive wars and tax cuts for the rich”.
…Yet, these veterans say, the troops risk exposure to the depleted uranium used in anti-tank munitions, which the Pentagon insists has no adverse health effects but veterans’ groups charge was part of the toxic cocktail that caused Gulf War syndrome.
To those who say Gulf War syndrome is all in the mind, as a new Australian study has concluded, they point to the fact that the Veterans Administration has classified 164,000 Gulf War veterans as disabled – more than one-quarter of the 585,000 eligible for benefits.
About 9,600 Gulf War veterans have died of a variety of causes since returning from the war, according to Veterans for Common Sense.

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s819514.htm
For many US vets, war is not the answer
US veterans were invited to the White House on Friday to applaud President George W Bush’s Iraq campaign but others who fought for their country vehemently oppose the war.
“It looked to me like he was taking advantage of selected veterans who were predisposed to his position,” said Seth Pollack of Veterans for Common Sense.
“I wouldn’t expect anything better from Bush. It was shameful.”
Mr Pollack’s association sent a letter, signed by about 1,000 veterans including two retired vice-admirals and actor Kris Kristofferson, to the President on the eve of the war rejecting the case for the use of force against Iraq and seeking a meeting to discuss humanitarian concerns.
The appeal was ignored, fitting into a pattern of behaviour anti-war veterans say is typical of an administration run largely by people with no war experience – starting with Mr Bush himself, who served in the National Guard in Texas during the Vietnam War.
Veterans believe they “have a vital role to play,” said Mr Pollack, “especially in an administration like this which is so under-represented (by veterans) and so willing to send other people’s kids to die when they haven’t served themselves”.
“Frankly, it’s a dangerous thing”.
With the war into its second week and US casualties mounting, combined with televised images of fierce attacks on US supply lines and the surprised reaction of soldiers and officers alike to the heavy resistance they have encountered, anti-war veterans are not the only ones questioning military strategists.
Adding to veterans’ anger and fuelling a growing sense of betrayal, last week the House of Representatives voted to approve a $25 billion cut in veterans’ benefits – including disability benefits – over the next 10 years at the same time as Mr Bush seeks massive tax cuts for a wealthy few.
“The President’s words about supporting the troops are quite empty, on two counts,” Erik Gustafson, who fought in the 1991 Gulf War, said of Mr Bush’s speech on Friday.
“One, there has been a series of miscalculations that put a lot of people in harm’s way unnecessarily, and secondly supporting our troops doesn’t mean turning our backs on our veterans, especially when we’ll be having a whole new generation of Gulf War veterans,” he said.
Mr Gustafson is executive director of the Education for Peace in Iraq Centre, which he set up in 1998 with an emphasis on improving living conditions for ordinary Iraqis.
Mr Pollack said the cuts to veterans’ benefits are “an indication of the lengths to which this administration is willing to go to fund their priorities, which are obviously aggressive wars and tax cuts for the rich”.
As the noose tightens around Baghdad, fears are mounting that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein is saving his suspected arsenal of chemical weapons for a last desperate stand against inevitable victory by US forces.
Yet, these veterans say, the troops risk exposure to the depleted uranium used in anti-tank munitions, which the Pentagon insists has no adverse health effects but veterans’ groups charge was part of the toxic cocktail that caused Gulf War syndrome.
To those who say Gulf War syndrome is all in the mind, as a new Australian study has concluded, they point to the fact that the Veterans Administration has classified 164,000 Gulf War veterans as disabled – more than one-quarter of the 585,000 eligible for benefits.
About 9,600 Gulf War veterans have died of a variety of causes since returning from the war, according to Veterans for Common Sense.