Did the Shrub actually dare the Iraqi Militants “To Come And Get Our Troops?”
No, not quite. He only said “Bring them on.”
But it’s still pretty tasteless and inappropriate if you ask me. (Not that anyone did.)
It’s bad enough that we rushed over there without properly training our troops in how do deal with post-battle civil matters in urban areas.
It’s even worse that, two months after we tell them the hard part’s over and promise to send them home to their families, it turns out that we’re actually going to send even more of our boys and girls over there (and without telling us why it’s necessary exactly – or who we’re even fighting).
But that’s not all folks! On top of everything else, our “President” and Commander in Chief has pridefully encouraged this latest nameless, faceless enemy to give us the best they got.
Is this the new Rambo movie? Nope. This is reality, folks. This is the United States of American in the year 2003.
Let’s make this next year the last for the Shrub Regime. For GW, Jeb, or any other relatives of theirs we haven’t heard about yet that they might be saving for future elections.
Bush Taking Heat for ‘Bring Them On’ Remark
By Steve Holland for Reuters.

President Bush has used colorful language before to great effect, but he is taking some heat for his “Bring them on” challenge to Iraqi militants attacking U.S. forces, who he said were tough enough to take it.
Even some aides winced at Bush’s words, which Democrats pounced on as an invitation to Iraqi militants to fire on U.S. troops already the subject of hit-and-run attacks by Saddam Hussein loyalists and others.
“These men and women are risking their lives every day, and the president who sent them on this mission showed tremendous insensitivity to the dangers they face,” said Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean.
Another Democratic presidential candidate, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, said condemned the comment, saying, “The deteriorating situation in Iraq requires less swagger and more thoughtfulness and statesmanship.”

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad (Hmmm. It already has.):
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030703/pl_nm/iraq_bush_dc
Bush Taking Heat for ‘Bring Them On’ Remark
By Steve Holland
Reuters
Thursday 03 July 2003
President Bush has used colorful language before to great effect, but he is taking some heat for his “Bring them on” challenge to Iraqi militants attacking U.S. forces, who he said were tough enough to take it.
Even some aides winced at Bush’s words, which Democrats pounced on as an invitation to Iraqi militants to fire on U.S. troops already the subject of hit-and-run attacks by Saddam Hussein loyalists and others.
“These men and women are risking their lives every day, and the president who sent them on this mission showed tremendous insensitivity to the dangers they face,” said Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean.
Another Democratic presidential candidate, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, said condemned the comment, saying, “The deteriorating situation in Iraq requires less swagger and more thoughtfulness and statesmanship.”
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer dismissed the criticism and said Bush viewed his comment as a way to express confidence in U.S. troops.
“I think the men and women of the military are appreciative of the fact that they know they have a president who supports them as strongly as he does, and who has as much faith in their ability to complete the mission, despite some of the second-guessing that this president has,” Fleischer said.
Bush, a proud Texan with a penchant for plain talk, told reporters on Wednesday: “There are some who feel like that conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is: Bring them on. We have the force necessary to deal with the situation.”
‘Dead or Alive’
In the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks he said the United States wanted al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden “dead or alive” and vowed to “smoke” them out of their holes.
University of Texas political scientist Bruce Buchanan, a longtime Bush watcher, said Bush uses such language when under strain, and that he is likely feeling the heat of criticism about the lagging post-war effort in Iraq.
He called the remark an unfortunate choice of words because it sounded belligerent.
“I think that when he feels up against it, as he did at the time of the 9/11 attacks, or when he does when coming under criticism now, he has a tendency to strike back verbally, and I think that’s what you’re seeing there. He’s not choosing his words diplomatically at those moments because he’s not feeling particularly diplomatic,” Buchanan said.
At least 25 U.S. and six British troops have been killed by hostile fire since Bush declared major combat in Iraq to be over on May 1.
Brookings Institution presidential scholar Stephen Hess said many Americans like what they hear from the president, calling his words reminiscent of his defiant stance against the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks when he stood in the rubble of the World Trade Center towers and vowed to fight back.
“My observation is he’s saying exactly what the American people want him to say, and saying it even in a way that they would want him to say it,” Hess said.
He added: “Obviously we’re going into a presidential election era and one expects the opposition to oppose. That’s their job. But the sort of response that somehow he was inviting the enemy to attack us I think is more than a stretch.”