That’s right! Not only is nobody going home, but were actually going to send more troops over there.
At least they’re admitting now that these guys might be a formidable enemy after all, calling them “well-trained militants that have been killing and injuring US forces.”
Unfortunately, that just means that more of our soldiers will die.
Bush foresees long, ‘massive’ role in Iraq
By Dana Milbank for The Boston Globe.

President Bush acknowledged yesterday that the United States faces a ”massive and long-term undertaking” in Iraq but said US troops would prevail over what his administration described as well-trained militants that have been killing and injuring US forces.
Bush delivered his statement of resolve, some of his most extensive remarks about Iraq in the two months since he declared heavy fighting was over, as Americans are expressing concern about the unrest in US-occupied Iraq and as some legislators are accusing the administration of understating the task ahead…
Bush cast the struggle in Iraq as part of the ongoing war against terrorism in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere. He said that some of those attacking US forces in Iraq were from the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam and that the US government suspects fighters tied to Abu Musab Zarqawi, whom Bush called an Al Qaeda ”associate,” are preparing to attack. ”Less than two years ago, determined enemies of America entered our country, committed acts of murder against our people, and made clear their intentions to strike again” he said. ”As long as terrorists and their allies plot to harm America, America is at war.”
As part of the justification for the war in Iraq, Bush and his lieutenants described ongoing ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda. But a still-classified national intelligence report from that time raised doubts about those ties, intelligence officials have said.
According to a poll released yesterday by the University of Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes, 71 percent said they believed the Bush administration implied that Hussein was involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, while 25 percent believed Iraq was directly involved in the attacks…
Of the 195 US military personnel killed in combat and accidents since the Iraq war started on March 20 (42 British soldiers have been killed), nearly a third have died after May 1, when Bush, aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier, declared major combat operations were over.
The messiness of postwar Iraq had provoked criticism that the administration did not adequately prepare for the difficult task of rebuilding. Before the war, Bush spoke optimistically about a clean transformation of Iraq, saying US troops would not remain in the region ”for one day longer than is necessary.”
Senator Richard G. Lugar, Republican of Indiana and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said last week that the US presence in Iraq would be necessary for ”at least five years” and criticized Bush’s rhetoric. ”This idea that we will be in just as long as we need to and not a day more – we’ve got to get over that rhetoric,” he said. ”It is rubbish. We’re going to be there a long time. We must reorganize our military to be there a long time.”
The administration, which declines to forecast the duration of the US presence in Iraq, is due to decide later this month whether it needs more troops there. Bush’s press secretary, Ari Fleischer, yesterday played down the attacks on US soldiers as ”pockets of violence,” adding the media are ”ignoring the tremendous number of success stories” in Iraq.

Here is the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:
http://www.globe.com/dailyglobe2/183/nation/Bush_forsees_long_massive_role_in_Iraq+.shtml
President Bush acknowledged yesterday that the United States faces a ”massive and long-term undertaking” in Iraq but said US troops would prevail over what his administration described as well-trained militants that have been killing and injuring US forces.
Bush delivered his statement of resolve, some of his most extensive remarks about Iraq in the two months since he declared heavy fighting was over, as Americans are expressing concern about the unrest in US-occupied Iraq and as some legislators are accusing the administration of understating the task ahead.
At least 31 US and British military personnel have been killed and 178 wounded in fighting in Iraq in the nine weeks since Bush announced that major combat operations had ended. The US administrator in Iraq said yesterday that ”professional operations” with ties to the government of former President Saddam Hussein are responsible for the regular attacks on US forces. At least six US soldiers were injured yesterday in two separate attacks.
Bush, in a Rose Garden speech marking the 30th anniversary of the end of the military draft, spoke of ”terrorists, extremists, and Saddam loyalists” who have attacked US forces, intimidated Iraqis, and destroyed infrastructure. He warned of foreign fighters entering Iraq, Al Qaeda-linked groups waiting to strike, and former Iraqi officials ”who will stop at nothing” to recover power.
”These groups believe they have found an opportunity to harm America, to shake our resolve in the war on terror, and to cause us to leave Iraq before freedom is fully established,” Bush said. ”They are wrong and they will not succeed.”
Amid reports of lawlessness and anti-US violence in Iraq, Americans have begun to show ambivalence about the mission. In a Gallup poll done for USA Today and CNN, respondents were divided about the prospects for success in Iraq. Only slim majorities of 56 percent thought the postwar situation was going well and the war was worthwhile, while Americans were split on whether the United States would be able to kill or capture Hussein, find weapons of mass destruction, establish a stable democracy, and stop attacks on US soldiers.
L. Paul Bremer III, the US administrator of Iraq, said the attacks on troops were the work of Hussein’s former military and intelligence agents. ”These are professional operations,” Bremer said of the five- to- seven-man teams. ”These are not spontaneous attacks by angry laid-off workers.” Bremer said there is no sign yet the attacks are centrally coordinated, but that they seemed to have been organized before Hussein’s authority collapsed in early April.
Bush, like Bremer and other administration officials, expressed confidence the attacks would not succeed in weakening American resolve. ”There will be no return to tyranny in Iraq, and those who threaten the order and stability of that country will face ruin just as surely as the regime they once served,” the president said.
Bush cast the struggle in Iraq as part of the ongoing war against terrorism in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere. He said that some of those attacking US forces in Iraq were from the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam and that the US government suspects fighters tied to Abu Musab Zarqawi, whom Bush called an Al Qaeda ”associate,” are preparing to attack. ”Less than two years ago, determined enemies of America entered our country, committed acts of murder against our people, and made clear their intentions to strike again” he said. ”As long as terrorists and their allies plot to harm America, America is at war.”
As part of the justification for the war in Iraq, Bush and his lieutenants described ongoing ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda. But a still-classified national intelligence report from that time raised doubts about those ties, intelligence officials have said.
According to a poll released yesterday by the University of Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes, 71 percent said they believed the Bush administration implied that Hussein was involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, while 25 percent believed Iraq was directly involved in the attacks.
Bush, while allowing no doubt that he believed Iraq will be swiftly converted to a stable democracy, spoke of the menace to the 230,000 US troops in and near Iraq. ”Our whole nation, especially their families, recognizes that our people in uniform face continuing danger,” he said. ”As commander in chief, I assure them we will stay on the offensive against the enemy and all who attack our troops will be met with direct and decisive force.”
Of the 195 US military personnel killed in combat and accidents since the Iraq war started on March 20 (42 British soldiers have been killed), nearly a third have died after May 1, when Bush, aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier, declared major combat operations were over.
The messiness of postwar Iraq had provoked criticism that the administration did not adequately prepare for the difficult task of rebuilding. Before the war, Bush spoke optimistically about a clean transformation of Iraq, saying US troops would not remain in the region ”for one day longer than is necessary.”
Senator Richard G. Lugar, Republican of Indiana and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said last week that the US presence in Iraq would be necessary for ”at least five years” and criticized Bush’s rhetoric. ”This idea that we will be in just as long as we need to and not a day more – we’ve got to get over that rhetoric,” he said. ”It is rubbish. We’re going to be there a long time. We must reorganize our military to be there a long time.”
The administration, which declines to forecast the duration of the US presence in Iraq, is due to decide later this month whether it needs more troops there. Bush’s press secretary, Ari Fleischer, yesterday played down the attacks on US soldiers as ”pockets of violence,” adding the media are ”ignoring the tremendous number of success stories” in Iraq.
This story ran on page A1 of the Boston Globe on 7/2/2003.