Category Archives: The Shrub War

How The Shrub Administration Fabricated Details Of Jessica Lynch “Rescue”

According to the Iraqi doctors who first examined her, Jessica Lynch had no shot or stab wounds.
Her life was saved by the brave medical staff of an Iraqi hospital — whose members even donated their own blood when there was none on hand.
The military staged the whole “rescue” to give the cameras something to look at.
As far as the Shrub Administration is concerned, if all goes well, this rescue of Jessica Lynch was just the first of many “episodes” of these kinds of wars — coming soon to a TV channel near you.
Ripping yarns: how they ‘saved’ Private Lynch

Jessica Lynch became an icon of the war in Iraq. The story of her capture by the Iraqis and her rescue by US Special Forces became one of the great patriotic moments of the conflict. It couldn’t have happened at a more crucial moment, when the talk was of coalition forces bogged down, of a victory too slow in coming.
Her rescue, however, will go down as one of the most stunning pieces of news management conceived. It provides a remarkable insight into the real influence of Hollywood producers on the Pentagon’s media managers, and has produced a template from which America hopes to present its future wars.
But the American media tactics, culminating in the Lynch episode, infuriated the British, who were supposed to be working alongside them in Doha, Qatar. Tonight in Britain, the BBC’s Correspondent program reveals the inside story of the rescue that may not have been as heroic as portrayed, and of divisions at the heart of the allies’ media operation…
One story, two versions. The doctors in Nassiriya say they provided the best treatment they could for Lynch in the midst of war. She was assigned the only specialist bed in the hospital, and one of only two nurses on the floor. “I was like a mother to her and she was like a daughter,”says Khalida Shinah.
“We gave her three bottles of blood, two of them from the medical staff because there was no blood at this time,”said Dr Harith al-Houssona, who looked after her throughout her ordeal. “I examined her, I saw she had a broken arm, a broken thigh and a dislocated ankle. Then I did another examination. There was no [sign of] shooting, no bullet inside her body, no stab wound – only RTA, road traffic accident,” he recalled. “They want to distort the picture. I don’t know why they think there is some benefit in saying she has a bullet injury.”
The doctors said that the day before the special forces swooped on the hospital the Iraqi military had fled. Hassam Hamoud, a waiter at a local restaurant, said he saw the American advance party land in the town. He said the team’s Arabic interpreter asked him where the hospital was. “He asked: ‘Are there any fedayeen over there?’ and I said, ‘No.”‘ All the same, the next day “America’s finest warriors” descended on the building.
“We heard the noise of helicopters,” says Dr Anmar Uday. He says that they must have known there would be no resistance. “We were surprised. Why do
this? There was no military, there were no soldiers in the hospital.
“It was like a Hollywood film. They cried, ‘Go, go, go’, with guns and blanks and the sound of explosions. They made a show – an action movie like Sylvester Stallone or Jackie Chan, with jumping and shouting, breaking down doors.” All the time with the camera rolling. The Americans took no chances, restraining doctors and a patient who was handcuffed to a bed frame.
There was one more twist. Two days before the snatch squad arrived, Al-Houssona had arranged to deliver Jessica (pictured left) to the Americans in an ambulance. “I told her I will try and help you escape to the American army but I will do this very secretly because I could lose my life.” He put her in an ambulance and instructed the driver to go to the American checkpoint. When he was approaching it, the Americans opened fire.
They fled just in time back to the hospital. The Americans had almost killed their prize catch…
None of the details that the doctors provided Correspondent with made it to the video or to any subsequent explanations or clarifications by US authorities. A Pentagon spokesman in Washington, Bryan Whitman, declined to release the full tape of the rescue, rather than its edited version. He would not talk about what kind of Iraqi resistance the American forces faced. Nor would he comment on the injuries Lynch actually sustained. “I understand there is some conflicting information out there and in due time the full story will be told, I’m sure,” he said…
He acknowledged that the events surrounding the Lynch “rescue” had become a matter of “conjecture”. But “either way, it was not the main news of the day. This was just one soldier, this was an add-on: human interest stuff”.-”
The American strategy was to concentrate on the visuals and to get a broad message out. The key was to ensure the right television footage. The embedded reporters could do some of that. On other missions, the military used their own cameras, editing the film themselves and presenting it to broadcasters as ready-to-go packages. The Pentagon had been influenced by Hollywood producers of reality TV and action movies, notably Black Hawk Down.
In 2001, the man behind Black Hawk Down, Jerry Bruckheimer, had visited the
Pentagon to pitch an idea. Bruckheimer and fellow producer Bertram van Munster, who masterminded the reality show Cops, suggested Profiles from the Front Line, a primetime television series following US forces in Afghanistan. They were after human stories told through the eyes of the soldiers. Van Munster’s aim was to get close and personal.
It was perfect reality TV, made with the co-operation of Donald Rumsfeld and aired just before the Iraqi war. The Pentagon liked what it saw. “What Profiles does is give another, in-depth, look at what forces are doing from the ground,” says Whitman. That approach was developed in Iraq.
The Pentagon has none of the British misgivings about its media operation. It is convinced that what worked with Jessica Lynch and with other episodes of this war will work even better in the future.

Continue reading

Xeni Jardin’s Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003

Here is complete audio and video footage of the Warblogging panel at Etech 2003.
This panel was hosted by Boing Boing’s Xeni Jardin and included: Doc Searls, Dan Gillmor, Technorati’s David Sifry and BBC News Producer and warblogger Stuart Hughes calling in from England
There’s web-sized video in two parts and three parts, and MP3s of the audio in three parts.
This was easily one of the week’s most riveting panels.
In Two Parts (larger file sizes):
Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 1 of 2 (Small – 54 MB)
Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 2 of 2 (Small – 60 MB)
In Three Parts:
Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 1 of 3 (Small – 32 MB)
Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 2 of 3 (Small – 43 MB)
Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 3 of 3 (Small – 39 MB)
Audio – Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 1 of 3 (MP3 – 21 MB)
Audio – Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 2 of 3 (MP3 – 26 MB)
Audio – Warblogging Panel At Etech 2003 – Part 3 of 3 (MP3 – 23 MB)
Descriptions go with the photo directly below them.
Xeni Jardin

Stuart Hughes (from England via Telephone)

Crowd Shot (Jesse, Steve Jensen – middle, Kevin Burton – far right)


Stuart Hughes (from England via Telephone)


Doc Searls (left), Dan Gillmor

Doc Searls

Crowd shot. (Robert Kaye and Joey deVilla in the middle there.)

Pensive Xeni

Happy Xeni

David Sifry



Public Domain Dedication

This work is dedicated to the
Public Domain. (Take it and run, baby!)

US Troops Open Fire On Iraqi Protesters

Two Killed In New Iraq Demo Shooting
By Chris Hughes In Al-Fallujah with Pictures by Julian Andrews for The Mirror.

I watched in horror as American troops opened fire on a crowd of 1,000 unarmed people here yesterday.
Many, including children, were cut down by a 20-second burst of automatic gunfire during a demonstration against the killing of 13 protesters at the Al-Kaahd school on Monday…
A machine gun post at one of the corners swivelled round, taking aim at the crowd which pulled to a halt.
We heard no warning to disperse and saw no guns or knives among the Iraqis whose religious and tribal leaders kept shouting through loud hailers to remain peaceful. In the baking heat and with the deafening noise of helicopters the tension reached breaking point.
Julian and I ran towards the compound to get away from the crowd as dozens of troops started taking aim at them, others peering at them through binoculars.
Tribal leaders struggled to contain the mob which was reaching a frenzy.
A dozen ran through the cordon of elders, several hurling what appeared to be rocks at troops.
Some of the stones just reached the compound walls. Many threw sandals – a popular Iraqi insult.
A convoy of Bradley military jeeps passed by, the Iraqis hurling insults at them, slapping the sides of the vehicles with their sandals, tribal leaders begging them to retreat.
The main body of demonstrators jeered the passing US troops pointing their thumbs down to mock them.
Then came the gunfire – and the death and the agony.
After the shootings the American soldiers looked at the appalling scene through their binoculars and set up new positions, still training their guns at us.
An angry mob battered an Arab TV crew van, pulling out recording equipment and hurling it at the compound. Those left standing – now apparently insane with anger – ran at the fortress battering its walls with their fists. Many had tears pouring down their faces.
Still no shots from the Iraqis and still no sign of the man with the AK47 who the US later claimed had let off a shot at the convoy.

Continue reading

Top Blair Advisor Admits Real Reason For Invading Iraq (I’ll Give You One Guess)

This goes nicely with the article I just posted, where the Shrub Administration admits that a threat of WMDs wasn’t ever really there.
U.S., U.K. Waged War on Iraq Because of Oil, Blair Adviser Says
By James Kirkup for Bloomberg.

The U.S. and U.K. went to war against Iraq because of the Middle East country’s oil reserves, an adviser to British Prime Minister Tony Blair said.
Sir Jonathan Porritt, head of the Sustainable Development Commission, which advises Blair’s government on ecological issues, said the prospect of winning access to Iraqi oil was “a very large factor” in the allies’ decision to attack Iraq in March.
“I don’t think the war would have happened if Iraq didn’t have the second-largest oil reserves in the world,” Porritt said in a Sky News television interview.
Opponents of the war, including some members of Blair’s Labour Party, have said that the conflict was aimed at securing Iraqi reserves to benefit Western economies and oil companies. U.S. and U.K. leaders have repeatedly rejected that, saying the war began because Iraq held illegal weapons and threatened other countries.

Continue reading

Shrub Administration Admits It Lied About WMDs

Well this takes the cake: the Shrub Administration has admitted that there Saddam had no WMDs.
They must be feeling pretty confident about the outcome of the war to just come right out and say this.
Good news for Syria? If there are no WMDs in Iraq, then we can’t follow them over the border into Syria. Right?
I’m looking for other articles with more details, but here’s one from Neil McKay of the Sunday Herald to start you off with:
US: ‘Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction’

Senior officials in the Bush administration have admitted that they would be ‘amazed’ if weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were found in Iraq.
According to administration sources, Saddam shut down and destroyed large parts of his WMD programmes before the invasion of Iraq.
Ironically, the claims came as US President George Bush yesterday repeatedly justified the war as necessary to remove Iraq’s chemical and biological arms which posed a direct threat to America.
Bush claimed: ‘Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. We will find them.’
The comments from within the administration will add further weight to attacks on the Blair government by Labour backbenchers that there is no ‘smoking gun’ and that the war against Iraq — which centred on claims that Saddam was a risk to Britain, America and the Middle East because of unconventional weapons — was unjustified.

Continue reading

Chairman Of Shrub’s Cultural Advisory Committee Steps Down In Protest Over Baghdad Museum Looting

Bush’s top cultural adviser steps down over looting of Iraqi museum

“The reports in recent days about the looting of Iraq (news – web sites)’s National Museum of Antiquities and the destruction of countless artifacts that document the cradle of Western civilization have troubled me deeply, a feeling that is shared by many other Americans,” he wrote.
Calling the looting a “tragedy,” Sullivan said that it was not prevented “due to our nation’s inaction.

Continue reading

American “Liberation” = Lockdown Without Electricity Or Water

Oh yeah, and be sure to not leave your homes during unauthorized time periods or you may be shot on sight. Proceed with caution.
And have a nice day.

Robert Fisk: For the people on the streets, this is not liberation but a new colonial oppression

America’s war of ‘liberation’ may be over. But Iraq’s war of liberation from the Americans is just about to begin

It’s going wrong, faster than anyone could have imagined. The army of “liberation” has already turned into the army of occupation. The Shias are threatening to fight the Americans, to create their own war of “liberation”.
At night on every one of the Shia Muslim barricades in Sadr City, there are 14 men with automatic rifles. Even the US Marines in Baghdad are talking of the insults being flung at them. “Go away! Get out of my face!” an American soldier screamed at an Iraqi trying to push towards the wire surrounding an infantry unit in the capital yesterday. I watched the man’s face suffuse with rage. “God is Great! God is Great!” the Iraqi retorted.
“Fuck you!”
The Americans have now issued a “Message to the Citizens of Baghdad”, a document as colonial in spirit as it is insensitive in tone. “Please avoid leaving your homes during the night hours after evening prayers and before the call to morning prayers,” it tells the people of the city. “During this time, terrorist forces associated with the former regime of Saddam Hussein, as well as various criminal elements, are known to move through the area … please do not leave your homes during this time. During all hours, please approach Coalition military positions with extreme caution …”
So now

Britian’s Premiere Scientific Organization Speaks Out: Shrub Administration Lied About Dangers To Troops And Civilians

Britian’s Royal Society is very upset that the Shrub Administration misrepresented that it agreed with the assessment that DU wouldn’t be dangerous to the inhabitants of the area.
Of course, this means that the dangers to our troops have also been misrepresented.
Scientists urge shell clear-up to protect civilians
Royal Society spells out dangers of depleted uranium
By Paul Brown for the Guardian UK.

Hundreds of tonnes of depleted uranium used by Britain and the United States in Iraq should be removed to protect the civilian population, the Royal Society said yesterday, contradicting Pentagon claims it was not necessary…
The society, Britain’s premier scientific institution, was incensed because the Pentagon had claimed it had the backing of the society in saying DU was not dangerous.
In fact, the society said, both soldiers and civilians were in short and long term danger. Children playing at contaminated sites were particularly at risk.
DU is left over after uranium is enriched for use in nuclear reactors and is also recovered after reprocessing spent nuclear fuel. There are thousands of tonnes of it in stores in the US and UK.
Because it is effectively free and 20% heavier than steel, the military experimented with it and discovered it could penetrate steel and concrete much more easily than convential weapons. It burns at 10,000C, incinerating everything as it turns to dust.
As it proved so effective, it was adopted as a standard weapon in the first Gulf war despite its slight radioactive content and toxic effects. It was used again in the Balkans and Afghanistan by the US.
DU has been suspected by many campaigners of causing the unexplained cancers among Iraqi civilians, particularly children, since the previ ous Gulf war. Chemicals released in the atmosphere during bombing could equally be to blame.
Among those against the use of DU is Professor Doug Rokke, a one time US army colonel who is also a former director of the Pentagon’s depleted uranium project, and a former professor of environmental science at Jacksonville University. He has said a nation’s military personnel cannot wilfully contaminate any other nation, cause harm to persons and the environment and then ignore the consequences of their actions. He has called on the US and UK to “recognise the immoral consequences of their actions and assume responsibility for medical care and thorough environmental remediation”.
The UN Environment Programme has been tracking the use of DU in the Balkans and found it leaching into the water table. Seven years after the conflict it has recommended the decontamination of buildings where DU dust is present to protect the civilian population against cancer…
Professor Brian Spratt, chairman of the Royal Society working group on depleted uranium, said that a recent study by the society had found that the majority of soldiers were unlikely to be exposed to dangerous levels of depleted uranium during and after its use on the battlefield.
“However, a small number of soldiers might suffer kidney damage and an increased risk of lung cancer if substantial amounts of depleted uranium are breathed in, for instance inside an armoured vehicle hit by a depleted uranium penetrator.”

Continue reading

“Relief” Agencies Plan On Bible Thumping While Feeding Iraq’s Needy

The Christian Science Monitor reports that Faith-based relief agencies in Iraq will be serving Christianity up with their meals.
When Bagdad was liberated last week, Iraqi Shiites who had been repressed under Sadam’s regime were chanting “At last! We can be a Muslim country!”
I doubt that trading religious oppression under Sadam for mandatory Christianity under faith-based relief organizations is what the Iraqi’s had in mind.
This is, of course, the problem with faith-based aid to begin with. If Faith-based organizations want to provide Aid, it should be a requirement of any organization doing work on behalf of our government — on behalf of the people of the United States — to leave the religious rhetoric at home. Especially when it known already to conflict with the beliefs of the people we are purportedly trying to help.

A crusade after all?

By Jane Lampman for the Christian Science Monitor.

Yet to many Muslims and Christians alike, proselytizing at this highly volatile moment in the newly liberated country, with Muslims worldwide questioning US motives, could only spur outrage and undermine US policy in the region as well as in Iraq.
“Coming in the wake of a military conquest of an Arab country, and of openly hostile statements by [the Rev. Franklin] Graham and others, it’s going to backfire in the worst way for US plans to be seen as a liberator,” says Seyyed Hossein Nasr, professor of Islamic studies at George Washington University…
Iraq is particularly volatile, because it has just emerged from a dictatorship and is under military occupation. And those planning to proselytize are known in the region: the former leader of the Southern Baptist Convention has called the prophet Muhammad a “demon-possessed pedophile,” and Mr. Graham, head of Samaritan’s Purse, has termed Islam “an evil religion.”
Their remarks flew across the Muslim world with such effect that a group of Baptist missionaries working in 10 predominantly Muslim countries sent a letter home calling for restraint and saying such comments “heighten animosity toward Christians,” affecting their work and personal safety.
Graham’s close ties to the administration – he gave the prayer at Mr. Bush’s inauguration and is invited to give the Good Friday prayer at the Pentagon – give Muslims the impression, some say, that evangelization efforts are part of US plans to shape Iraqi society in a Western image…
Such efforts reawaken colonialist images of missionaries following British and French troops into the Middle East in the 19th and 20th centuries. And that, critics add, plays directly into the hands of Osama bin Laden, whose missives have predicted a Christian crusade.

Continue reading