ILaw 2003
July 17, 2003
ILAW 2003 - Day 2 - July 1, 2003 AM 2 Of 2 - Lawrence Lessig On The Importance Of The Web's End To End Architecture

The most important point:


End to end character of the web.

How this was a design choice.

Intelligence is at the edges. Network is simple.

Dominant monopoly can't control/discriminate.
Can't see who people are.
Can't forbid certain uses.

This was a fundamental architectural choice.


Larry On End-to-End - Part 1 of 4
(Small - 69 MB)

Larry On End-to-End - Part 2 of 4
(Small - 59 MB)

Larry On End-to-End - Part 3 of 4
(Small - 81 MB)

Larry On End-to-End - Part 4 of 4
(Small - 74 MB)























Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.



day 2 tape 3

Larry On End to End Architecture

The end to end character of the logical layer

2:26 - Difference Between AM and FM Radio

4:15 - How Sarnoff Tried to...

AM/FM Radio Backrounder

David Sarnoff vs. Armstrong and RCA

Packet Switching

How AT & T discriminated against any ideas that wouldn't benefit their monopoly.

How competition can be crushed by the dominant network provider.

Excite/AT&T - Dominant cable provider
"Blood sucked from our veins"

9:30 - Innovations that gave birth to the internet

10:50 - All by kids and non-americans

11:52 - Policies and Consequences of Architecture

12:08 - End to end character of the web. How this was a design choice.

Intelligence is at the edges. Network is simple.

Dominant monopoly can't control/discriminate.
Can't see who people are.
Can't forbid certain uses.
This was a fundamental architectural choice.

23:14 - Hourglass model
Note to transcribe some of this...

26:20 - voice over IP

32:15 - Commons - What is a commons

33:30 - Tragedy of the commons

34:30 - rivalrous and non-rivalrous resources

39:40 - Innovation Commons

41:40 - Why the property model makes no sense on the Internet.

How it just doesn't make sense to propertize all resources.

44:35 - Strategic behavior

Competitors do things that benefits them but harms the network

45:40 - Microsoft case - defensive manipulation - note to highlight this

MS stops around 52:00

54:20 - consumer-financial innovation

57:20 - unlicensed spectrum

Day 2 Tape 4

8:00 Media Consolidation

11:00 How the Internet needs to run like the electric network

he mentions my weblog around 12:00

16:20 - Neutral Networks (Note: not "neural" but "neutral"

22:00 - Q and A - why complexity is bad

note: after this point, the numbers are iffy...

27:13 - when property rights aren't appropriate

28:29 - Eldred economists amicus brief - "no brainer."

32:00 - maybe "commons" isn't the right word

not either or but a balance between property and FREE

Eldred wanted to publish his annotated Robert Frost poems.

Note from lisa: people are always asking me what the work was that Eric Eldred was waiting to fall into the public domain that originally brought about the court case. The answer is "Robert Frost poems."

Posted by Lisa at July 17, 2003 08:14 AM | TrackBack
Me A to Z (A Work In Progress)
Comments

"guarantee a sliver"

Sounds like the last bastion, between freedom, and the "leak proof pipe." They, the same as seek to remove the last of 2e2, resemble, not surprisingly, those who want the "leak proof pipe."

I'm right to count Eben Moglen among you.

Posted by: Hamish MacEwan on July 30, 2003 06:48 PM

"guarantee a sliver"

Sounds like the last bastion, between freedom, and the "leak proof pipe." They, the same as seek to remove the last of 2e2, resemble, not surprisingly, those who want the "leak proof pipe."

I'm right to count Eben Moglen among you.

Posted by: Hamish MacEwan on July 30, 2003 06:49 PM

"guarantee a sliver"

Sounds like the last bastion, between freedom, and the "leak proof pipe." They, the same as seek to remove the last of 2e2, resemble, not surprisingly, those who want the "leak proof pipe."

I'm right to count Eben Moglen among you.

Posted by: Hamish MacEwan on July 30, 2003 06:56 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


No free link advertizing is allowed here. If you post a commercial link in this comment you agree to pay me $500 per link pursuant to the Terms posted here. Type "AGREE" here:

Comments:


Remember info?