We might have to wait till the new year for Lott to be ousted, but perhaps he'll come to his senses and step down with whatever dignity he might have left and save us all a Lott of trouble.

Congress has a ton of other things to do, true, but I'd say this situation could serve to put a lot of other issues on hold until it is dealt with.

I, for one, am ready to keep the pressure on as long as it takes.

Here's an excellent progress report from Howard Fineman (With Eleanor Clift and Martha Brantfor) for Newsweek:
Ghosts of the Past.

He (Lott) had begun his career as a staffer to an ardently segregationist congressman. Blacks have a dim view of his record—against the Voting Rights Act, against a Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, in favor of racially restrictive policies at Bob Jones University...

...There were gasps when Lott uttered his remarks. There was enough of a sense of history in the room to know that Lott was praising one of the nastiest, openly racial campaigns of modern times. “People were shocked,” said conservative Armstrong Williams, who was on hand for the festivities...

The ensuing controversy gathered force slowly, helped along by some of the most inept damage control since the Maginot Line was built. Lott first said, dismissively, that he was “winging it”—until it was discovered that he had said the same thing 22 years earlier. Lott made this and other press “appearances” by phone while holed up with his wife on vacation in Key West, Fla. His aides assured White House officials that he would utter the key words “segregation is immoral” on “Larry King,” but he somehow forgot to do so. Bush went ballistic at this point. He also heard that GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel was about to denounce Lott. The president ordered up a harsh condemnation of Lott’s remarks. “Senator Lott has apologized, and rightly so,” a stern-visaged Bush said. Lott got the message, and scheduled his full-dress press conference—with the proper wording included—for the following day...

White House officials, afraid of offending “the base”—the Southern white conservatives who elected Lott and Bush—were careful not to openly work for Lott’s ouster. “They don’t want any fingerprints on this,” said one GOP strategist.

Here's the full text of the article in case the link goes bad:

http://www.msnbc.com/news/847739.asp

MSN Home | My MSN | Hotmail | Search | Shopping | Money | People & Chat
MSN.com
MSNBC.com
Home page
Navigation

IMG: Bush and Lott
During a speech Thursday, President George Bush rebukes Sen. Trent Lott (right) for remarks he made at Sen. Strom Thurmond's birthday party
Ghosts of the Past
It was a Washington classic: History suddenly rears up and threatens a safe pol’s security. Anatomy of the Lott firestorm

By Howard Fineman
NEWSWEEK

Dec. 23 issue — Mitch McConnell, who loves his role as Washington’s coldest-blooded tough guy, got right to the point in a cross-country conference call last Friday night with a score of his fellow Republican senators. The topic: what to do about The Leader?

Advertising on MSNBC
• eDiets Diet Center
• Shop at B&N.com
• Auctions at uBid
• Yellow Pages
• lavalife.com Where singles click
• MSN Broadband

IMG: Dec. 23, 2002 Issue TRENT LOTT had just finished his fourth, and most fulsome, apologia for having praised Strom Thurmond’s stridently segregationist presidential campaign of 1948. Many GOP bosses—in and out of the White House—still wanted Lott bounced from his role as majority leader when the Congress returns next month. Lott, in their view, had come across as too much of a “seg,” an embarrassment in a party eager to sell itself as a Big Tent of “compassionate conservatism.”
As the call began, McConnell—second in command and a Lott ally—delivered a history lesson. “Leaders who are ousted tend to leave altogether,” he said in his voice-of-doom baritone. “That is what Newt Gingrich did. That is what Jim Wright did. They don’t stick around.” If Lott left, he noted, the Democratic governor of Lott’s home state of Mississippi would name one of his own as a replacement. Republicans relishing the return of perks, power and committee chairmanships could forget it. Instead, they would face the kiss-your-sister chaos of a 50-50 Senate. “I was just explaining the history,” McConnell told NEWSWEEK. Other participants remember the moment differently. “He was raising the idea that Trent would blow himself up,” said one. Lott, for his part, distanced himself from the threat—even as aides still were making it on his behalf. “My term runs through 2006,” he told NEWSWEEK. “I intend to serve it, whatever happens.”


Submit your questions on race, the GOP and Trent Lott and join Jon Meacham for a live talk on Wednesday, December 18 at noon ET
Your Question

Your name

Your hometown

Your e-mail address

Click here for more details

This was Lott’s lot late last week: confident enough to discuss the possibility of losing his leader’s role—because, his aides contended, he felt he wouldn’t lose it. Still, behind the scenes, he was desperately trying to cajole support from colleagues warily assessing whether the perfect storm that had engulfed him would abate—or sweep him into oblivion. No one talked of a coup attempt. (“It would be pretty stupid to do that on a conference call,” said one participant.) But a suggestion for a second meeting-by-phone went unheeded, as did an idea, floated by a handful of senators in cross talk, for a signed letter of support.

MORE POWER THAN FRIENDS
The rise and folly of Trent Lott is a classical Washington saga. Here is the plotline: A politician with more power than friends fails to see that times have changed. Oblivious, even giddy, he mistakenly calls attention to an obvious fact about himself that the establishment, for a variety of reasons, has tolerated or ignored. Suddenly, he’s too outrageous for words, and he becomes the scapegoat for a city determined to show its moral rectitude. Think: Tony Coelho and money, Gary Hart and sex. And now Lott and the Southern, segregationist roots of the GOP.

Lott says he won’t quit
December 13, 2002 — Sen. Trent Lott held his first lengthy news conference Friday about his remarks on the 1948 presidential campaign of now-Sen. Strom Thurmond. NBC’s Norah O’Donnell reports.

All of Washington understood that Lott, proud of his background in the Mississippi of the ’50s, was among the last—and most visible—of the Hill barons to have grown up in the segregated Deep South. He had begun his career as a staffer to an ardently segregationist congressman. Blacks have a dim view of his record—against the Voting Rights Act, against a Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, in favor of racially restrictive policies at Bob Jones University. Yet these days George W. Bush is trying to portray the GOP as an inclusive party, one that reaches out to all minorities and conveys an aura of tolerance to affluent white suburbanites looking for an alternative to the Democrats. With the GOP back in power on the Hill, and Bush’s pushing centrist themes, Lott was —suddenly in a bigger—more dangerous—spotlight. “He was an accident waiting to happen,” said a GOP strategist.
Should Trent Lott resign his position as incoming senate majority leader?
Yes. His apologies are insufficient and insincere
No. Let's move on
I don't know

Vote to see results

The accident happened, the world now knows, at Thurmond’s 100th-birthday party on Capitol Hill. Thinking he was only among friends—or perhaps in Pascagoula, Miss., in the ’60s—Lott buttered up the honoree by proclaiming jovially that the country wouldn’t have “all these problems” had the Dixiecrats won power in 1948. There were gasps when Lott uttered his remarks. There was enough of a sense of history in the room to know that Lott was praising one of the nastiest, openly racial campaigns of modern times. “People were shocked,” said conservative Armstrong Williams, who was on hand for the festivities.

INEPT DAMAGE CONTROL
The ensuing controversy gathered force slowly, helped along by some of the most inept damage control since the Maginot Line was built. Lott first said, dismissively, that he was “winging it”—until it was discovered that he had said the same thing 22 years earlier. Lott made this and other press “appearances” by phone while holed up with his wife on vacation in Key West, Fla. His aides assured White House officials that he would utter the key words “segregation is immoral” on “Larry King,” but he somehow forgot to do so. Bush went ballistic at this point. He also heard that GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel was about to denounce Lott. The president ordered up a harsh condemnation of Lott’s remarks. “Senator Lott has apologized, and rightly so,” a stern-visaged Bush said. Lott got the message, and scheduled his full-dress press conference—with the proper wording included—for the following day.

The usually brotherly Bush failed to praise Lott personally in any way, leaving it to underlings to issue bland statements of support for Lott as leader. That, in turn, encouraged many conservatives, including the editors of The Wall Street Journal and The National Review, to demand Lott’s ouster. But White House officials, afraid of offending “the base”—the Southern white conservatives who elected Lott and Bush—were careful not to openly work for Lott’s ouster. “They don’t want any fingerprints on this,” said one GOP strategist. Democrats were glad to make trouble, but—on second thought—liked the idea of keeping him around as a convenient target.

Race, Politics, and Trent Lott
• Audio: David Bositis, Senior Political Analyst at Joint Center for Economic and Political Studies David Brooks, NEWSWEEK Contributing Editor; Senior Editor of The Weekly Standard
• Audio: Listen to the complete weekly On Air show
As for Lott, he sounded like a man trying to stay calm in a hurricane. He’d been reared in a different day and time, he said. He wasn’t the angry young man he was—no longer “the hot-blooded Scot.” “My daughter told me I’m much calmer than I used to be,” he said. “I’ve grown more mature and accepting as a result of deepening religious faith.” Now he knew that his early views were wrong, unacceptable and, yes, immoral. Whether he was telling the truth about his beliefs was a question to be decided in Another, Better, Place. For now, the more urgent issue was whether Lott had testified in time to help himself in Washington.

With Eleanor Clift and Martha Brant